Backdating al capone
Dowd came to work at the Palos Hills offices of Heritage and Aegis in 1997, after earning a degree in business finance. Because the purchaser thus retained control over the assets assigned to the trusts, the transfer of those assets into the trust amounted to nothing more than a paper transaction with no economic substance. We have noted, for example, that the purportedly independent trustee named in the creation of the trust routinely would resign shortly after the trust was created and be replaced by the client on whose behalf the trust was created. Harsh interrogation when Vallone moved to dismiss indictment on speedy trial grounds. The defendants assert that "the court's animosity towards defendants was fully on display" during the testimony of David Jenkins. As we have said, Jenkins testified under a grant of immunity. 1517), that the monetary transfers associated with demands on promissory notes were not illegal (R. 1385), and that Jenkins understood Vallone to be attempting to establish a system that complied with U. The defendants read entirely too much into this brief request of Jenkins. When Mc Leese persisted in attempting to elicit an answer from Parker on the right against self-incrimination, the court summoned Mc Leese to a sidebar, and then, as it had with Jenkins, decided instead to excuse the jury from the courtroom, after which it reprimanded Mc Leese for persisting in the inquiry notwithstanding the court's warnings. At the same time, it would have been a legitimate way for the defense to point out that the letters sent out by Parker were not wholly frivolous in their content, and in turn to argue to the jury that the letters were not, contrary to the government's view, simply a means of evading and obstructing the IRS audits. We understand Mc Leese to have been trying to distinguish the pretrial ruling which declared the constitutionality of the tax laws off limits, but the ambiguous wording of this remark may have simply confirmed, in the court's mind, that the constitutionality of the tax laws was precisely what Mc Leese intended to explore with the witness. 4.05); (b) as we have discussed, the district court never communicated its theory that notice of illegality to one conspirator, or notice to the conspiracy generally, constitutes notice to all members of the conspiracy; (c) the government argued notice as an individual matter, and each defendant was free to argue that he did not have notice that the Aegis system was illegitimate; and (d) despite the court's express invitation, Dowd never tendered a cautionary instruction as to the ARDC evidence that he contends was so prejudicial.
Vallone and Michael Dowd served as directors and officers of Sigma. That the Aegis trust system was a fraudulent scheme was borne out in the manner in which the underlying documentation was prepared. Within the overall context of a lengthy trial, this was a discrete and ultimately harmless error. Recall that Jenkins was the individual who helped set up offshore entities in Belize for Aegis clients. It is pure speculation to suggest, even against the backdrop of the judge's interruptions of Jenkins, that the jury must have inferred the judge's disbelief of and unhappiness with Jenkins' testimony. However, the court, in the apparent belief that Mc Leese was running afoul of its pretrial ruling barring any effort to show that the federal tax laws were unconstitutional, interrupted Mc Leese sua sponte and at one point instructed the jury that the constitutionality of the tax laws was not at issue. Eliciting Parker's acknowledgment that taxpayers do have a Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination would not have called into question the constitutionality of the Internal Revenue Code or the legitimacy of the IRS audit notices. Relevant to the question of prejudice would be (a) the district court's instruction to the jury that it was to consider each defendant individually (R. 7389; Seventh Circuit Pattern Criminal Jury Instruction No. Renewing the motion at that time would have given the court an opportunity to consider any specific ways in which Dowd believed the joint trial had resulted in actual prejudice to his defense.
Pursuant to the Aegis system, "customers appeared to sell their assets to several trusts when, in fact, customers never really ceded control of their assets." Hills, 618 F.3d at 624. We proceed to consider each of the actions that the defendants cite as illustrative of the district judge's bias against them. The PSR acknowledged that Dowd did not create the Aegis scheme, did not manage other participants, and did not receive the largest share of profits from the scheme. He had check-signing authority so that he could pay Aegis's bills. In 2000, he was promoted to "operations manager" of Aegis and Heritage, and although that may have been more of an administrative role than a managerial one, it supports the notion that he was not a minor participant in the Aegis scheme. Moreover, as the government points out, Dowd benefitted from certain breaks in the district court's Guidelines calculations: because the court held Dowd responsible for a loss amount of million rather than million based on the five years of his involvement, R. The comparable length of the sentences imposed on Bartoli and Cover were based on their respective ages and health. The ways in which the Aegis trusts were structured and used (for example, the routine resignation of the nominally-independent Aegis trustee and replacement with the client shortly after each trust was formed, typically pursuant to paperwork that was executed when the trust was created) would make plain even to a non-lawyer and non-accountant that the transfer of income and assets to the trusts was in form only, and that the Aegis client never in fact surrendered any control of those assets and income.
Although the Aegis system of trusts was portrayed as a legitimate, sophisticated means of tax minimization grounded in the common law, the system was in essence a sham, designed solely to conceal a trust purchaser's assets and income from the IRS, thereby reducing his apparent tax liability and defrauding the United States of revenue to which it was entitled. As we have discussed, he represents that he was not sophisticated in the laws governing trusts, taxation, or offshore banking and that he did not comprehend the scope and nature of the Aegis scheme; instead, he trusted his father, Vallone, Bartoli and others who assured him that Aegis was legitimate. 1039 at 62-63), and the evidence certainly supports that finding. He signed a commission agreement, promoted Aegis trusts to several clients, and actually sold trust packages to three clients (although he denied playing any meaningful role in recruiting these clients). He knew as of 1999 (two years before his departure) that roughly ninety of those clients were under investigation by the IRS. 2000)), whereas the November 2008 version of the Guidelines that the district court applied at sentencing specified an offense level of 28 for that loss amount (see U. Although Hopper's Cheek defense was, in some superficial respects, more appealing than those of other defendants, the record is by no means devoid of evidence from which the jury could reasonably find that Hopper lacked a subjective good faith belief in the legality of the Aegis system even prior to the Tax Court's decision in Muhich and his subsequent decision to resign from Aegis. From the very beginning, the Aegis trust system was obviously and incontrovertibly at odds with the fundamental proposition that the tax liability on income and assets rests with the individual who controls those assets.
The trusts were marketed to and implemented for customers across the United States through a network of corrupt promoters, managers, attorneys, and accountants. For the reasons we articulate below, we discern no proof of actual bias on the part of the judge. Dowd contends that he did not profit from the scheme at all. He was the primary person who dealt with Jenkins in Belize to arrange for the requisite documentation as to offshore companies and trusts for Aegis clients and to ensure that clients made demands on their promissory notes in the offshore system in order to make those notes appear legitimate. He was subsequently named to the Aegis Advisory Board, which consulted with Vallone on the operation of the Fortress Trust. 1039 at 67, Dowd faced a sentencing range of 121 to 151 months rather than 151 to 188 months; and the court declined to apply an enhancement for obstruction of justice despite its acknowledgment that the government had a "very strong argument" that Dowd had committed perjury while testifying in his own defense, id. The court also took into consideration Dowd's "rationalization" as opposed to willingness to accept responsibility for his conduct. We may assume that another judge might have imposed a lesser sentence on Dowd. 2008) (below-Guidelines sentence will almost never be unreasonable). Ex Post Facto Clause As we have indicated, a relatively recent change in the Guidelines resulted in an increase to Dowd's offense level and the resulting Guidelines sentencing range. Hopper's own words at a videotaped Aegis seminar -- the recording of which was offered for sale and, in fact, was purchased by Agent Priess -- suggest that he understood full well that the purpose of the Aegis trusts was simply to hide a client's money from the IRS: It's, it's taking it from one pocket and putting it in the other and you know and then, and then standing before your wife and saying, "See, I got no money, see." That's, that's what it amounts to.
They were sentenced to prison terms ranging from 120 to 223 months. The Aegis trusts were typically marketed to wealthy, self-employed individuals whose income could not be easily traced through the W-2 forms that are issued to ordinary taxpayers. But routinely, within a few days after the trust was first established -- and sometimes before the client had even transferred assets to the trust -- the Aegis attorney would resign by means of a boilerplate letter citing "circumstances beyond [his] control," and appoint the client as his replacement. Ostensibly, pursuant to such a contract, a trust would provide services to the client's business, for which the business would in turn compensate the trust. We ourselves have observed that a record of delays sought by the defendant will cast doubt on the validity of his subsequent contention that he has been deprived of his right to a speedy trial. Adams, supra, 625 F.3d at 379 (citing United States v. Parker prepared these letters based on a template that he had been given by Vallone. On cross-examination, Vallone's counsel, Mc Leese, sought to elicit from Parker a confirmation that taxpayers do have certain rights with respect to an IRS audit, including a Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate themselves. On cross-examination, Mc Leese sought to establish in some detail the context, chronology, and thoroughness of the search. But the court, believing that Mc Leese's questions implicated the legality of the search, repeatedly interrupted Mc Leese, saying it had already ruled on this line of inquiry, and told him to move on. When the defendants have been properly joined in a single indictment pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8(b), as is conceded here, a court should grant a severance only when "there is a serious risk that a joint trial would compromise a specific trial right of one of the defendants, or prevent the jury from making a reliable judgment about guilt or innocence." Id.
Dunn, and Edward Bartoli of conspiring to defraud the United States by impeding and impairing the functions of the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and to commit offenses against the United States, along with related fraud and tax offenses. Both Parker and Stambulis would later plead guilty and testify against the remaining defendants at trial. With the aid of Aegis personnel, a purchaser nominally would transfer his assets -- including his businesses and residence -- to one or more trusts and formally cede control of those assets to the named trustee, typically Bartoli, Parker, or Stambulis. The income that Aegis clients derived from their businesses was also diverted to the trusts by means of management and consulting contracts between the clients' businesses and their trusts, an arrangement that Aegis personnel suggested and helped to implement. Vallone's motion was brought on the eve of trial after years of pre-trial litigation and multiple requests for delay sought by the defendants themselves, agreed to by Vallone's counsel, and granted in some instances over the objection of the government. And, as we have also noted, expressions of impatience and annoyance -- which are to be expected with eleventh-hour motions complaining of delays that the defendants themselves sought -- are not sufficient by themselves to establish actual bias on the part of the judge. The issue vis-à-vis Parker arose with respect to his testimony concerning the Audit Arsenal letters he sent to the IRS on behalf of Aegis clients who had received notice that they would be audited by the IRS. At bottom, the letters were part of an effort to thwart IRS inquiry into the Aegis trusts. Smyros was one of the agents who participated in the March 7, 2003 search of Vallone's home. The court, by contrast, was concerned that Mc Leese was attempting to suggest that the search was improper in some way. Mc Leese continued to pose questions of Smyros aimed at eliciting the purpose and thoroughness of the search.
David Parker, a New York attorney, served as the legal director of Aegis Management. As the defendants themselves put it to their clients, the clients would "own nothing but control everything." R. Moreover, in many instances, the trust documents were back-dated to make it appear that a client had (nominally) transferred his assets to the trusts long before he had even purchased the trusts -- sometimes years earlier -- in order to retroactively claim the tax advantages of the trusts. They contend that it is evident from the transcript of the hearing on that motion that the court felt it had been "sandbagged" by Vallone's counsel and took personal offense at the suggestion that it had deprived Vallone (or any other defendant) of the right to a speedy trial by granting the defendants' own requests for continuances. Having reviewed the transcript of the hearing, we disagree with the contention that the court's reaction to the motion bespeaks an anti-defense bias. For example, Jenkins testified that the backdating of documents was not prohibited under Belizean law (R. The defendants next argue that the judge's unwillingness to allow Vallone's counsel to pursue certain relevant lines of inquiry during the cross-examination of two government witnesses (Parker and Special Agent Andrew Smyros), and its apparent impatience with the length of time counsel spent on the direct examination of Vallone, displayed bias. He argues only that the court's repeated interruptions and admonitions show bias at work. In challenging the denial of his request for a severance, the defendant must show that the refusal to sever resulted in "actual prejudice" that deprived him of a fair trial. As the government points out, "[a] motion for severance is typically waived if it is not renewed at the close of evidence, primarily because it is then that any prejudice which may have resulted from the joint trial is ascertainable." United States v.
In addition to assisting the Aegis principals, Dowd provided management services to trust purchasers through both Aegis and Sigma. Again, the sole purpose of the trust was to conceal the purchaser's assets from the IRS in an effort to reduce his tax liability. Typically the boilerplate resignation letter was prepared and signed at the same time as the paperwork creating the trust, although it was dated several days later, leaving no doubt that the resignation of the initial, "independent" trustee was planned from the outset. The defendants next cite as evidence of the district court's bias its reaction to the motion to dismiss the indictment that Vallone filed shortly before the trial, invoking the Speedy Trial Act. The defendants contend that the court castigated Mc Leese, questioned whether the motion had been filed in good faith, and interrupted Mc Leese repeatedly, evincing an animosity to the defense that went well beyond the impatience that one might otherwise expect in reaction to an eleventh-hour motion of this sort. And although he was the government's witness, some of what he said, principally during cross-examination by defense counsel, was favorable to the defense. Reaction to Cross-Examination of Parker and Special Agent Smyros, and Direct Examination of Vallone. Perhaps the court was misled on this point, when, at an initial sidebar, Mc Leese remarked, "What this has to do with is the constitutionality of the tax laws, not of filing a tax return, but rather of asserting your constitutional rights in response to an audit request." R. In any case, Vallone makes no argument that he was prejudiced by the ruling. However, Dowd's failure to renew his motion to sever at the close of evidence precludes us from reaching the merits of his argument on appeal.
Search for backdating al capone:
Immediately, I dragged him back into the room and warned him never to interfere with my groups again." began to date Osbourne, and took over his management from her father. Reportedly, the next time Sharon visited Don, his vicious pet dogs savaged her. Sharon eventually married Osbourne and had no contact with her father for 20 years.